Logseq/Flashcard/Bug/Blank Flashcards
Blank flashcards in flashcard review
- I was working on logseq flashcard review today in in Logseq/Flashcard/Review with
{{cards ( or [[rg]] [[vim]] [[nvim]] [[fzf]] [[Zoxide]] [[yazi]] [[tmux]] [[Lazygit]] [[Lightroom/Classic]] )}}and I came across a few flashcards that were blank. I couldn't advance beyond them. - Cause: empty outline bullets (
-with no text) nested under otherwise valid#card/[[card]]blocks. Review walks child blocks; those steps had no renderable body, so the UI showed blank “slides” and felt like a hard stop until each step was graded. - Repo fix: a deck-scoped scan (same
orlink set as on Logseq/Flashcard/Review, matching ancestor[[…]]text plus obvious hub filenames) found two cards with stray empty children: Lightroom/Classic/Keyshort/Managing Photos and Catalogs/Show in Explorer and Finder (two trailing empty bullets) and tmux/Keyshort/Pane/Rotate Panes (one trailing empty bullet). Those bullets were removed; a repeat scan reports zero empty bullets under matching deck cards. - Coverage check: no matching deck card lacked a substantive answer subtree (ignoring
card-*::lines). The[[nvim]]disjunct did not match any cards by ancestry that the other query links did not already cover (everything in this pass was already tied to another scope link or hub filename). - Docs / tooling: Logseq docs clone at
~/Documents/GitHub/logseq/docs—pages/Flashcards.md,pages/Queries.md.nbbwas not onPATHin the environment used; verification used a small Python outline pass (tab depth,#card/[[card]], walk deeper bullets until outdent) instead of an NBB-Logseq script.
- I was working on logseq flashcard review today in in Logseq/Flashcard/Review with