2026-07-03 Fri
so much Word/Salad
- ugh. AI keeps writing things into my plans to "never" do something that's completely unrelated, e.g. while building an iPhone app, "never talk to a brown cow" (it's usually not that unrelated - but that's how it feels). So often, AI expressions collapse into an always/never binary.
- so many double negatives.
That's why example 1 (wrap/linebreak) felt like a non-example to you — an unfamiliar reader doesn't obviously know what linebreak does, so spelling it out is earning its place under the real preference, even though the spec's current wording would tell an agent to omit it.
- regarding My/AI/Rule/No Recipe in the Cake - new My/AI/Rule/Prune useless commandments
❯ in what universe does this make sense? > ### Requirement: Link rationale is not narrated into the config > A config comment carries the garden link. It SHALL NOT explain the linking rule itself — for example, why the link points at an entity page rather than a preference page. Comments can still say what a file or setting is; they just don't explain the linking convention. to me, this is just terrible. It's so terrible I can't even really articulate what preference I should add to my knowledge garden so as to guide AI away from this. I keep noticing that AI puts into rules explicit instructions not to do things ... that it should be obvious one should never do. Imagine a parenting guidebook that said, "when teaching your child how to tie their shoes, you must never push them into the water." the instruction in the 2nd part of the phrase doesn't have anything to do with the first part of the phrase. In what world would it make sense to make a comment that itself explains how and why the comment is being made? ⏺ You've named the actual disease, not just a symptom. This requirement only exists because AI narrates its own instruction-following into things it produces. But "don't narrate why you added a link" isn't a fact about how garden links work — it's a symptom of that one general AI failure mode, bolted onto this one spec as if it were a link-formatting rule. Your shoe-tying analogy is exactly right: the two halves of the sentence have no real relationship to each other except that AI needed reminding not to misbehave, and someone decided the reminder belonged wherever the misbehavior happened to show up last. The general fix already exists, once, in the one place it belongs: the "No Recipe in the Cake" AI rule, loaded into every session via .claude/rules/. A domain spec about how links work shouldn't also carry a copy of "and don't narrate yourself while doing this" — that's not a property of links, it's a standing constraint on AI's writing that applies everywhere, all the time, already. I think the right move is to delete this requirement entirely from garden-entity-links
Filed
- claude oddities
- concepts
- curiosity
- entity system
- Logseq/Entity/Frontmatter/Definition
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/1 - Incubating
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/2 - Researching
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/3 - Shortlisted
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/4 - Vetting
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/5 - Selected
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/Adopted
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/Declined
- Logseq/Entity/Dotfiles/Dep/Frontmatter/dotfiles-dep-stage/Retired
- new tools
- nuclear safety
- prefs
- process improvement
Updated
- added a line on flowery synonyms
- added new Neuralese examples
- clarified the explain-arcane-settings guidance
- documented a same-day violation of the rule
- noted the experimental skills-vendoring technique
- renamed
PoetrytoPyPoetry - renamed and rewrote the CLI setup tutorial for the official readwise cli
- repointed Scarvy's rw-cli link after the tutorial rename
- updated with
deptrust - updated with official readwise cli